hi, On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:44:27 +0100 Chase Douglas <chase.doug...@canonical.com> wrote: > > could you also make sure to make your PPA build for armhf (which is > > likely to be the supported arm subarch for precice (to be decided at > > feature freeze) ? > > I don't know how to do that. I'll ask, but I would guess the answer is > no at this point due to the newness of armhf in Ubuntu. > it is the matter of filing one RT ticket and waiting a few days for IS and a LOSA to enable the arch for the respective PPA, if it already builds armel it is a no-brainer to also enable armhf ...
the important part for us is that if you start the transition now, can
you guarantee that all packages are in order for the alpha2 milestone on
armhf without having them built in the PPA ?
our image builds indeed depend on the package dependencies
being correct in the archive and we don't want to risk missing alpha2
due to this transition.
armhf is our poposed default arch for precise and there are high chances
that arm might even be an LTS this time round so we urgently need the
testing of the last milestone before feature freeze where we plan to
make the final decision about the default arm arch.
ciao
oli
pgppbsvMRb9it.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
