On 12/18/2012 09:23 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote: > Hello, > > On 18.12.2012 01:52, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> UDD is not mature or reliable enough to be presented to new users as "the" >> way to do packaging for Ubuntu. I think the current guide is fatally flawed >> as is. >> >> As soon as a branch is out of date, new users are lost. > while out-of-date branches and other bits and pieces around UDD are a > problem, can we please make them a separate discussion? > > We can certainly have a discussion about our Development Guide and what > we recommend in which way. The reality and motivation of the current > discussion is that two guides are simply confusing and that the Wiki > documentation hasn't been touched or updated in any meaningful way in ages. > > I'd suggest we agree on one guide and then figure out what we recommend, > rewrite or improve in there. This shouldn't be a blocker for obsoleting > one of the guides. > > Have a great day, > Daniel > I think the point is that the new guide would have to include the pull-lp-source/debdiff/attach to bug route as well before some of us are comfortable deleting that information from the Wiki. It's not so much where it lives as that it's available as a fallback. Thanks, Micah
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
