On 02/28/2013 02:11 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On 28 February 2013 14:33, Micah Gersten <mic...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> Yes, but our britney doesn't delay migration to allow for testing of the >> built packages or block based on RC bugs filed. I see us getting to the >> point at some time in the future of being more stable than testing in a >> rolling release, but I don't see it right now. Perhaps if we had our >> own version of unstable/testing in the rolling release, we could >> approach that level of quality. However, being that Debian has >> maintainers for each package (in theory) and we don't, I'm not sure that >> Ubuntu has the manpower to do this type of split. > I think we need to train our britney to block on Debian or Ubuntu RC > bugs. This makes sense. But, we'd need to be able to flag certain Debian RC bugs as not affecting Ubuntu where appropriate.
> Maybe this will also allow the Kubuntu developers to package the > KDE beta updates without needing to worry about those getting picked > up in the next (monthly?) update cycle. This won't help as using britney to block migration means that it won't get testing by end users. Micah -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
