On Tuesday, March 05, 2013 08:07:36 PM Jono Bacon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > > What percentage of code in the default install is covered by automated > > tests? > I am not sure, maybe the QA team can weigh in on this. > > > For a relatively small project, such approaches are conceivable. For > > something the size of an installed Ubuntu (pick your favorite flavor) > > system, I think we're a long ways away from being sufficiently > > instrumented with tests. > I agree: I think automated testing is going to be essential here to > *assure* quality across the system. I think we would need ensure that > we have good test coverage across the core components.
I agree. My main point is that such things are pre-requisites to a new release model. We don't have them, so we should get them before we change to something we're not ready to support. Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
