On Monday, March 11, 2013 12:40:56 AM Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi all, > > Rob wrote: > > On 10 March 2013 14:38, Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > > Our SRU policy reflects this: we only allow updates to stable releases > > > for > > > specific bugfixes, and don't allow other changes. > > > > ... except for firefox. And kernels. > > > > -Rob > > And for LibreOffice. Except that it doesnt work, when even a SRU suggested > for the *LTS release* gets first submitted on 2012-11-02 and gets struck in > the SRU queue so long that it receives updates on 2012-11-28, 2013-01-10 > and 2013-01-24 for additional issues found and fixed in the meantime to > finally hit the repo on 2013-02-15 -- some three and a half months later. > Anyone rejecting rolling releases outright for keeping 'business as usual' > is mistaking the map for the territory.
Why didn't it get released sooner? Regressions? Lack of testing? Telling everyone to use the development series between LTS releases won't help this. Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel