2013/3/20 Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com>: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 07:27:05AM +0001, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: >> W dniu śro, mar 20, 2013 o 2:41 ,nadawca Colin Watson >> <cjwat...@ubuntu.com> napisał: >> >I've added "latest" symlinks alongside the existing "current" on >> >cdimage.ubuntu.com (e.g. >> >http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntukylin/daily-live/latest/). The >> >intent of this is that "latest" will continue always pointing to >> >the very latest build, while "current" will point to the latest >> >build that has passed automatic smoke-tests. The latter is not yet >> >implemented, so "current" is always the same as "latest" right >> >now, but I hope to get this working soon. >> >> While I love the idea I cannot think of more confusing words. Could >> we perhaps reconsider this to be something that does not require a >> README file around? > > Hm, this came out of UDS ... > >> If backwards compatibility is not important (the name 'current' can >> be discarded) then I would propose using "lastes-tested" and >> "latest-untested" > > Backwards compatibility is essential and I will not rename "current". > But I suppose I could rename "latest" to "latest-untested". Anyone > else?
When I read that the outcome of the rolling release discussion is a symlink pointing to the release in development, I had no doubt that it will be called "unstable", because that's how Debian calls the same thing. -- Gediminas -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel