On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:13 PM Rafael David Tinoco <rafaeldtin...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > On 29/04/2020 00:10, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > > Dan, Billy, and all... > > part of the result from this thread is at: > > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-ha-pacemaker-resource-agents-supportability/ > > And the fence agents can be found over here > > https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-ha-pacemaker-fence-agents-supportability/15768 > > The same (as bellow) applies to this list.
I'm +1 on the discussion there, for resource and fence agents. I think splitting them up makes a lot of sense to better categorize them by supportability. > > > and will at the Ubuntu Server Guide for 20.04 (Ubuntu HA session being > finished). > > I changed wording to guarantee this is seen as a community effort and to > differentiate from any Ubuntu Advantage offering. > > Categories are: > > Resource Agents: [main] > Resource Agents: [universe] > Resource Agents: [universe]-community > Resource Agents: [non-supported] > Resource Agents: [deprecated] > > > From now on, in my head, we're 1:1 with Ubuntu Advantage in nomenclature. > Note that resource-agents are in [main] and fence-agents are in [universe]. > Despite that, the list is what defines our efforts for support - server & SEG > - on those, at least until I split all agents into more packages. > > I'm creating another discourse for fencing-agents as well, same thing. > > Please give me your +1 if possible, and feel free to -1 with suggestions. > > Cheers, > > -rafaeldtinoco > > On 07/04/2020 23:47, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > > I added a few comments below, otherwise all the categories look > reasonable to me, thanks! > > Thanks for the feedback Dan! > > -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel