On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 11:28:25AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > So, I think the bootstrap solution might be:
> > 1. Verify that g-g-j-pgtype (1.10.0-3) actually does build > > successfully against g-g-j-pgx-dev (3.6.2-2). (This is probably > > best to verify in a PPA.) If so, then... > > 2. Request an Archive Admin to delete from -proposed: > > - golang-github-jackc-pgtype (1.10.0-4) source & binary > > - golang-github-jackc-pgx (4.15.0-4) source & binary > > 3. Prepare and upload g-g-j-pgtype (1.10.0-3), and verify it > > builds ok. Then proceed with syncpackage on both packages to pull > > in the newer versions. > Of course, when an in-archive bootstrap is possible, this is always nicer! > Since William has already confirmed that the above works, I'm not waiting > for him to ask on Monday and have done the above. However, it doesn't appear to have worked in the archive. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-jackc-pgtype/1.10.0-3/+build/24130112 shows the package is dep-wait on golang-github-jackc-pgx-v4-dev, from the newer golang-github-jackc-pgx that we're trying to bootstrap. So I'll hand this back over to y'all to debug and tell me what's missing :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
