Hi Sergio, On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 06:31:39PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > * r-bioc-savr > - There's an RM bug against the package on Debian. I didn't touch the > FTBFS.
However, Debian package removal requests take an indeterminate amount of time to be acted on by the ftp team, and in the meantime this leaves the package in update_excuses for other folks to lose time on. In cases such as these, please either: - talk directly to an archive admin in realtime to have the package removed from -proposed (a pointer to a Debian removal bug is sufficient rationale for a removal), or - file a bug tagged update-excuse that documents the situation, pointing to the Debian bug and subscribing ubuntu-archive to it so it can be handled asynchronously. Shameless plug: https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubuntu-dev-tools/+git/ubuntu-dev-tools/+merge/444677 gets you halfway there on the bug filing ;) In this case, it appears that in the meantime Debian has decided to fix the package rather than removing it, so no further action is required now by the Archive Team. > * repowerd > - Investigated a bit. I can build the package locally but it fails to > build on LP due to dh_missing complaining. Are you using up-to-date debhelper on noble? There have been recent changes in debhelper's handling of systemd units, precisely for the /lib vs /usr/lib question. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
