On 06/06/12 13:43, John Arbash Meinel wrote: > We're trying to work with webops to get Jubany at least upgraded from > Lucid to Precise,
Great, what's the estimated timeline for that? > and then follow it up with something beyond that. > We're considering trying to get an LXC running Q, or maybe just > backporting Q's pristine-tar for precise. An LXC just for this feels like an overengineered solution to me. Even backporting Q's pristine-tar to precise puts Canonical Ops on the critical path, whereas we could avoid that by doing what we've done for bzr itself and install a suitably recent version just for the pkg_import user. Max.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
