The packages look fine, but I'm unsure on the rationale here. If openhpi
is to become an officially supported feature in lucid, why would we only
have the library in main? Shouldn't we support the actual programs as
well? Does the server team commit to looking after the package in an
Ubuntu/release management/testing context?
** Changed in: openhpi (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
[MIR] openhpi
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515976
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
High Availability Team, which is a direct subscriber.
Status in “openhpi” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete
Bug description:
Binary package hint: openhpi
1. Availability: amd64, armel, i386, ia64, powerpc, sparc
2. Rationale: The package helps meet
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-lucid-cluster-stack
blueprint goal. Needed binary packages are libopenhpi2 and libopenhpi-dev.
3. Security: No CVEs
4. QA: 2 minor bugs in Debian, no bugs in Ubuntu. Upstream is active
(http://www.openhpi.org/)
5. UI standards: none
6. Dependencies: all in main
7. Standards: no lintian warnings. Package is packaged with debhelper and
doesn't have patches.
8. Maintenance: simple package, syncs should be enough (there were no Ubuntu
changes in package history)
9. Background information: this package is one of dependencies for new cluster
stack in Ubuntu.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
