https://salsa.debian.org/ha-team/pacemaker/merge_requests/1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
High Availability Team, which is subscribed to pacemaker in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863437

Title:
  [focal] pacemaker i386 should drop a few i386 only packages

Status in pacemaker package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in pacemaker source package in Focal:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  When executing pacemaker i386 autopkgtests I realized that package
  "resource-agents" wasn't available for i386. When discussing this with
  @vorlon we came into the conclusion that some i386 only cluster
  packages could be removed from the repository, towards the effort of
  having *only the essential* packages available in i386 (to be run
  together with an amd64 host).

  IRC log:

  """
  <rafaeldtinoco> resource-agents i386 binary package
  <vorlon> the pacemaker binary is /not/ present on i386 in the release pocket
  <vorlon> that may have been an overly aggressive removal
  <rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: are u keeping pacemaker because of dependencies ?
  <vorlon> yeah, I removed it when I shouldn't have
  (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/i386/pacemaker)
  <vorlon> rafaeldtinoco: pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of something else we 
need,
  see the referenced germinate output for full details

  https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-
  output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends

  <vorlon> pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of dlm
  <vorlon> and libesmtp-dev is a build-dep of pacemaker, not the other way 
around
  <vorlon> (and dlm is a build-dep of lvm2)
  <rafaeldtinoco> ah gotcha
  <rafaeldtinoco> dlm -> corosync -> pacemaker
  <vorlon> so, even though I removed the binary in error from the release 
pocket,
  the right answer is still for pacemaker/i386 binary to go away (leaving only 
the
  -dev and lib packages)

  <vorlon> do you want me to fix that up, or do you want to?
  <rafaeldtinoco> to fix that we should do like we did to samba ?
  <vorlon> yeah

  <vorlon> looks like the binaries you'll need to drop are pacemaker,
  pacemaker-cli-utils, pacemaker-remote
  <vorlon> and I'll remove those from -proposed right now, so that those don't
  hold up migration

  <vorlon> but I'll hold off on adding the hint until they're dropped from the
  source
  <rafaeldtinoco> deal, and next hint ill do with proper branch
  """

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1863437/+subscriptions

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
Post to     : ubuntu-ha@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to