This bug was fixed in the package pacemaker - 2.0.1-5ubuntu5
---------------
pacemaker (2.0.1-5ubuntu5) focal; urgency=medium
* Fix: Last attempt i386 binary packages removal was wrong (-Nlibkate)
* Ubuntu i386 binary compatibility only effort: (LP: #1863437)
- i386 binary package removal:
- pacemaker
- pacemaker-cli-utils
- pacemaker-remote
- pacemaker-resource-agents
-- Rafael David Tinoco <rafaeldtin...@ubuntu.com> Sat, 15 Feb 2020
18:52:20 +0000
** Changed in: pacemaker (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
High Availability Team, which is subscribed to pacemaker in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863437
Title:
[focal] pacemaker i386 should drop a few i386 only packages
Status in pacemaker package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in pacemaker source package in Focal:
Fix Released
Bug description:
When executing pacemaker i386 autopkgtests I realized that package
"resource-agents" wasn't available for i386. When discussing this with
@vorlon we came into the conclusion that some i386 only cluster
packages could be removed from the repository, towards the effort of
having *only the essential* packages available in i386 (to be run
together with an amd64 host).
IRC log:
"""
<rafaeldtinoco> resource-agents i386 binary package
<vorlon> the pacemaker binary is /not/ present on i386 in the release pocket
<vorlon> that may have been an overly aggressive removal
<rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: are u keeping pacemaker because of dependencies ?
<vorlon> yeah, I removed it when I shouldn't have
(https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/i386/pacemaker)
<vorlon> rafaeldtinoco: pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of something else we
need,
see the referenced germinate output for full details
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-
output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends
<vorlon> pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of dlm
<vorlon> and libesmtp-dev is a build-dep of pacemaker, not the other way
around
<vorlon> (and dlm is a build-dep of lvm2)
<rafaeldtinoco> ah gotcha
<rafaeldtinoco> dlm -> corosync -> pacemaker
<vorlon> so, even though I removed the binary in error from the release
pocket,
the right answer is still for pacemaker/i386 binary to go away (leaving only
the
-dev and lib packages)
<vorlon> do you want me to fix that up, or do you want to?
<rafaeldtinoco> to fix that we should do like we did to samba ?
<vorlon> yeah
<vorlon> looks like the binaries you'll need to drop are pacemaker,
pacemaker-cli-utils, pacemaker-remote
<vorlon> and I'll remove those from -proposed right now, so that those don't
hold up migration
<vorlon> but I'll hold off on adding the hint until they're dropped from the
source
<rafaeldtinoco> deal, and next hint ill do with proper branch
"""
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1863437/+subscriptions
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
Post to : ubuntu-ha@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
