On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Shrikant Khanduri < shrikant.khand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your RAM Comsumption will be more wrt 32 bit OS. > Can you kindly elaborate on the above point, as I am skeptic about how 32bit consumes more RAM? > Although Future is 64 Bit OS. Go for it. > > > > On 7 April 2010 19:09, Abhinav Modi <abhinavm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Mohamed Khaleel <gotokhal...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hello Everyone, >> > >> > I have a Core 2 Duo PC and I have to install Ubuntu on it. I would like >> to >> > know if I have to go with 32 bit or 64 bit. Sure I know that 32 OS bit >> will >> > work on 64 bit processor. But I want to really use the 64 bit if its >> > supported by processor. >> > >> > Are there any known issues in the 64 bit version of Ubuntu with Core 2 >> Duo >> > (if supported)? >> > How is the availability of softwares(open source, some graphics card >> drivers >> > etc)? >> > Will all 32 bit packages work on 64 bit Ubuntu OS? >> > >> >> Have been using Ubuntu 64 bit with an AMD Quad Core (9.10, upgraded to >> 10.04 beta recently). Haven't had any issues with 9.10 at all. With >> 10.04 there is some problem with flash, which will hopefully be >> resolved before final release. >> >> I would say go for 64 bit. >> >> Hope this helps >> Abhinav >> >> http://indimark.blogspot.com >> http://www.employees.org/~abhinav/blog<http://www.employees.org/%7Eabhinav/blog> >> >> -- >> ubuntu-in mailing list >> ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in >> > > > -- > ubuntu-in mailing list > ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in > >
-- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
