On 4/9/07, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 09:24:07PM -0300, Martin Albisetti wrote:
> > === Ext4 Support Dropped in Feisty ===
> >
> > The ext4 file system will not be included in Feisty. While it is not
> > likely to corrupt files, it is not believed to be stable yet.
> > Announced at: 
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2007-March/000672.html
>
> Ext4 was not dropped from Feisty.  It is an experimental filesystem which
> was never part of Feisty in the first place; its authors recommend against
> using it for purposes other than development.
>
> Something similar happened with the compiz announcement, where in Issue #30
> the headline was "No Beryl or Compiz for Feisty" when in fact Feisty brings
> great improvements in this area: compiz is installed by default and easier
> than ever to enable.
>
> I like the fact that UWN is informal and lightweight in its processes; it's
> perhaps the only way to keep pace with events in the project and in the
> community.  However, I'm concerned about the effect of misleading headlines,
> especially when they are reprinted in publications which are read by people
> who don't follow project events first-hand.
>
> What do you think we can do to help avoid further problems like this?

I need to be more aggressive about editing. I know that text is mine,
but the headline I am not so certain about. Regardless, I will try and
catch these errors.

Also, I Daniel chen/ crimsun used to help us edit, so I will drag him
back in again. He has a good solid head for technical stuff, plus
being a MOTU.

Corey

-- 
ubuntu-marketing mailing list
ubuntu-marketing@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing

Reply via email to