On Saturday 18 August 2007 04:07, Neil Wilson wrote: > Sorry Scott, but we're going to have to disagree on that point. > > Fundamentally ubuntu development is based around launchpad, and you > have to get involved in that if you want to deal with bugs, upgrades > and the like.
I guess this is where we disagree and the rest follows. Ubuntu development is based around the Debian package management system. LP is a tool used to support some aspects of the effort. Additionally, before you start demanding that I do things in the way that's easy for you, remember that I'm a volunteer. On a related note, I really don't think we need to make it easier to submit packages. There were already far more packages uploaded than we have MOTUs (or hopefuls) to properly review. Many of these packages were completely uncared for by the person that uploaded them. In mid-July I went through REVU and commented on every package that hadn't been touched since May (6 weeks) and asked if uploaders were still interested (it was several dozen, but I don't have the exact number) and got exactly one reply. More efficient/effective review tools are where our bottleneck is. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
