Hi, On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:58:41AM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote: > 1. The Packaging Guide is the only developer documentation not on the > wiki. We have all our process documentation, policies, release > schedule, etc. on the wiki. If quality and vandalism were a problem > then I be more worried about pages like UbuntuDevelopment, > StableReleaseUpdates, and FreezeExceptionProcess. But so far I haven't > seen any complaints.
I think it makes more sense to have the packaging guide in the wiki since most of the other packaging ressources are there too. Now that daniel is working on cleaning up the wiki pages, it'd be a good opportunity to merge the two. I tend to use the packaging guide when I need some information and refer other packagers to it because its structure makes more sense than the wiki pages. As for the editing quality, we could use a similar system to the Specification, where there is a discussion section at the end of each wiki page. It seems to work well for the Specification. -- Mathias -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
