In recent discussion in -devel-discuss, there was the folllowing excerpted exchange:
Am Mittwoch, den 17.10.2007, 09:24 -0400 schrieb Peter (Ubuntu List): > I did check to see if I could help out creating packages for as some > call it, the inside Ubuntu community. All I could find was becoming a > MOTU which is a whole process and I wasn't, and I'm still not, ready for > that. Am Mittwoch, den 17.10.2007, 10:19 -0400 schrieb Daniel Holbach: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Recipes/PackageUpdate > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess > > It's really quite easy. If you think we could improve things by speeding > them up somehow or explaining the process better, please let me know - > I'm happy to help out and fix it. From this, I receive the impression that 1) the current available documentation indicates that becoming MOTU is the appropriate mechanism by which one contributes new packages or package updates, 2) that our documentation is likely either difficult to navigate or understand to someone unfamiliar with our culture / history / internal mechanisms / something yet unidentified, and 3) that speeding up the MOTU application process is desireable. Personally, I'd like to add greater stress on the mechanisms by which individuals with irregular interest may contribute with new packages and backports, although I'm not sure we have the documentation so well organised. What do others think: would there be a benefit to getting more people to help with backports and new software packaging where those people may not be interested in later becoming MOTU, or engaging in the sustained and significant contribution expected for members? Somewhat orthoganally, if it is appropriate to provide documentation and encouragement to such individuals, and towards such goals, is that something best done by MOTU generally, or would it make sense for this effort to be spearheaded by a separate (but perhaps overlapping) group? Also related, were such an effort to be undertaken (whether within MOTU or alongside), how might the additional volume of Ubuntu-origin packages (whether new software or new upstreams) affect MOTU efforts? Is this something we can handle? Do we have the necessary mechanisms in place to make sure that Ubuntu-origin packages do not age without attention? Separately, how do others feel about accelerating the process to join MOTU? Should it be relatively simple (people demonstrate they can fix some bugs, have some basic packaging skills, and interact with the MOTU community), or relatively complex (people demonstrate a significant committment to sustained Ubuntu development, specific interests and goals towards the improvement of Ubuntu, and have already become a respected member of the Universe packaging / development community (MOTU + possible future MOTUs + participatory DDs & upstreams + casual universe developers)? I can see benefits to both sides, but have yet to see significant discussion on the topic aside from "there's too much work: more people would help". -- Emmet HIKORY -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu