-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephan Hermann schrieb: > Personally, I'm missing some more fine granulated permissions for users > and teams, regarding bug working on LP. > Means, (as an example) giving the right for adding tasks without having > some other guy to approve, I don't think it's good to do that with > inheriting the "bug control team". > I think it would make more sense, to "force" LP Devs, means Canonical as > driving force behind LP, to implement a useful permission system, where > the teamlead can give or take special rights from a user or even a > "sub-team".
AFAIK Everybody can add a task to a bug. Can you elaborate or do you have a different example? Let's file bugs on LP for those cases where applicable. Have a nice day, Daniel - -- My 5 today: #204066 (puppet), #106903 (gnome-alsamixer), #103227 (amarok), #192953 (pychess), #206198 (gnome-system-tools, network- manager) Do 5 a day - every day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/5-A-Day -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH9fr0RjrlnQWd1esRAtclAJ0Z5G4VXlQBDt7o3zORBUGVpYKhIQCcCTX2 HyHCpeLGppLUBH2uhBHchXg= =kly0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
