On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 09:09, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 09:05:25 pm LI Daobing wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 09:00, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: >> > On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 01:29:46 pm Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> >> Ubuntu Tweak is waiting for approval in New queue. >> >> http://ubuntu-tweak.com/ >> >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/252140 >> >> >> >> Is this something MOTU wants included? >> > >> > No. >> > >> > It looks to me like something that, in addition to proper packaging, >> > ought to have a thorough functional review before entering the archive. >> >> I am the packager of ubuntu-tweak, can you tell me what's the problem >> with ubuntu-tweak? >> > > I don't know that there is a problem, but given the invasive nature of it's > functionality, I think it appropriate for it to be given more of a review than > just being packaged properly. In Ubuntu's history there have been multiple > "Tweak" programs and so far they have always proved to be more harmful than > helpful at the scale the Ubuntu archive operates. > > This one may be the one that gets it right, but having found that they rebrand > PPAs that other people maintain as there's on their web site, I'm not at all > inclined to assume this is all well intentioned. >
you are right. this package is active-maintained, and I'll forward your opinion to the upstream author. I think he'll fix this bug. ubuntu-tweak is very useful for me, and it's also has many users. so I want to push it to Ubuntu and hope it can catch ubuntu 10.10. thanks. -- Best Regards LI Daobing -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu