Unless if you are a developer something like you develop utilities/applications that relies heavily on X-dev, I can't see any reason why you aren't comfortable with another window server alternative, since it is transparent to the user, also Wayland was develop with backward compatibility in mind, so the transition is smooth. The difference is that we can expect GNOME and KDE to be faster to render windows than what we have today.
----- Original Message ----- From: "[C]hicken [G] od" <iamthechicken...@gmail.com> To: "Mailing List para sa Ubuntu Pilipinas (Philippines)" <ubuntu-ph@lists.ubuntu.com> Sent: Saturday, November 6, 2010 5:50:13 PM Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-PH] Ubuntu ditches X for Wayland.. On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Allan E. Registos < allan.regis...@smpc.steniel.com.ph > wrote: Mark Shuttleworth: " Timeframes are difficult. I’m sure we could deliver *something* in six months, but I think a year is more realistic for the first images that will be widely useful in our community." http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551 Unless someone in the community will provide for us a mock-up or something, we will wait for four years from now to fully experience the wayland based desktop. I would be interested to know if anyone has had real face time with Wayland. Just when I was starting to get comfortable with X and Gnome....*sigh* -- [C] hicken [G] od -=>Hi Tek, Lo Life<=- http://planet-zero.blogspot.com -- ubuntu-ph mailing list ubuntu-ph@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ph
-- ubuntu-ph mailing list ubuntu-ph@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ph
