Hi, I wonder then why the silo was marked as 'Tested: Yes' if the basic testplan wasn't completed? It was also my fault for letting it through and I'm really pissed about that. Apologies here.
Manuel - could you add a landing for this branch? I'll take care of it, test it and release it during the weekend ASAP. On 01.03.2014 17:47, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Manuel de la Pena > <manuel.delap...@canonical.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manuel de la Pena >> <manuel.delap...@canonical.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Alan Pope <alan.p...@canonical.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Image #213 (and subsequent image #214) have a broken >>>> ubuntu-download-manager). This will prevent (amongst other things) >>>> being able to install packages from the store. Bug filed:- >>>> >>>> >>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-download-manager/+bug/1286553 >>>> >>>> If you have already upgraded, you can roll back using:- >>>> >>>> ubuntu-device-flash --channel=trusty-proposed --revision=212 >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>> Reading the logs is not that udm is not downloading the file correctly and >>> they are in disk, the issues is related to the fact that the click command >>> is not finding the file (probably the temp file was not renamed on time), >>> I'm surprise this landed taking into account that I clearly specified that >>> the click scop MOST always be tested when landing udm as per >>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlan/ubuntu-download-manager >>> >>> Anyway, I'm fixing it before monday. >>> >> >> To be clear, I'm not blaming anyone.. but please when we land thins things >> in the CI train people should follow the testing plan, specially when I, for > > > The CI Train process is new, so mistakes are made and we expected such > things to happen. Good news is that the testplan we have for these > components would have caught this issue during the landing process, so > it's just getting the process fully established. > >> example, do not have a device and testing all udm paths on the emulator atm >> is not feasible :-( > > >> >> PS: Who ever has a nexus 4 not used, please take my money, I'll be more that >> happy to pay for one and do also QA before the silo lands. > > One should be en-route to you very soon and thanks for the quick fix! > >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Manuel >>> >>>> -- >>>> Alan Pope >>>> Engineering Manager >>>> >>>> Canonical - Product Strategy >>>> +44 (0) 7973 620 164 >>>> alan.p...@canonical.com >>>> http://ubuntu.com/ >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone >>>> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone >>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone >> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > -- Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com www.canonical.com -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp