On Mar 03, 2014, at 02:50 AM, Alejandro J. Cura wrote: >You mention that you don't like the download manager doing the >installation, but to put it more strictly: the download manager is >actually just running a command given by the scope when a given >download is completed. And the installation proper happens in that >command. This is done, as you've explained, because the scope process >may already be dead by the time that the download has finished, and >the dash may not be showing the preview for the current download so >it's not keeping track of the download progress and finished signals.
It makes me uncomfortable for u-d-m to be running a command. In general, I think u-d-m should have one job only: download files it's asked to download. >If needed we can replace this with a dbus call that activates a >process in a different security context; but I fail to see a problem >yet with spawning a process from udm. Can you shed some more light on >it? Moreover, I can't see how doing things differently would have >prevented this specific bug. Sounds like Ted has a workable approach that's worth investigating. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp