On 1 Mar 2014 20:54, "Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak" < lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > So, I went in and did a priority landing of the fix. Alan helped me out > testing the whole test plan and we decided to land it. Reverting was a > bad idea since the silo had a few different components in it, so it was > more straightforward this way. Hopefully the next image will be fine. > > It was also a mistake on my side, again assumptions assumptions - but no > use finding excuses. I apologize for my part and I promise this will not > happen again. >
Superb!!! > Anyway, thanks Manuel and Alan! :) Thank you!! Lets get back to our weekend :) > > On 01.03.2014 19:49, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > On Mar 01, 2014, at 03:35 PM, Roberto Alsina wrote: > > > >> There was also a lack of thorough verification on my side as one of the > >> landers: I asked "did you guys check this" because I could not. I did not > >> ask "did you guys follow the whole test plan?" > >> > >> So, a learning opportunity all around :-( > > > > Several of us also had good discussions yesterday about getting the whole > > stack QA and automatically tested. That's a huge step toward ensuring no > > regressions. Let's make sure that click updates are also on that plan. > > > > -Barry > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > -- > Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak > lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com > www.canonical.com > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp