The message was meant or the Manual team. I chose the wrong mailing list. Sorry about that!
Thomas On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:23 PM, ubuntu-quality-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com wrote: > Send Ubuntu-quality mailing list submissions to > ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ubuntu-quality-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ubuntu-quality-ow...@lists.ubuntu.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Ubuntu-quality digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Upgrade tests are there own product (Nicholas Skaggs) > 2. Re: Hackfest planning (Sergio Meneses) > 3. Re: Quick Question... (Sergio Meneses) > 4. Re: Upgrade tests are there own product (St?phane Graber) > 5. Introduction Harry Hawk (HABS) > 6. Re: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 Beta 1 (Nio Wiklund) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:12:57 -0400 > From: Nicholas Skaggs <nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> > To: "ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com" > <ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com>, ubuntu-rele...@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Upgrade tests are there own product > Message-ID: <5141f709.1070...@canonical.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" > > Pas was asking about why upgrade tests are currently there own product > (image) on the tracker, and as such are lumped away from the main > product (image) tests. Is there a reason for this? Pasi was hoping more > visibility would be had if those tests were pushed back into the main > products themselves. So for example, the upgrade xubuntu tests would > appear under xubuntu with the other installation tests. > > I know historically they've been seperated out, so I was hoping for some > background information or feedback from someone who might have a reason > to object to the change of moving these tests back into the main products. > > Cheers, > > Nicholas > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130314/383fdbc1/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:14:23 -0500 > From: Sergio Meneses <sergioandresmene...@gmail.com> > To: "Javier P.L." <chilic...@ubuntu.com> > Cc: "ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com" > <ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com> > Subject: Re: Hackfest planning > Message-ID: > <cajdxczz90xjriu4eed2ab_9rfgm6+-qanhq35sm7yjqjnj3...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi all! > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Javier P.L. <chilic...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > >> On 13/03/13 at 06:41pm, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: >>> I know we're all knee deep in testing this week, but I would like to >>> talk about planning for our next hackfest. We've done 3 so far this >>> cycle, and I'd like to squeeze in one more if we can before beta2 >>> testing. >>> >>> I'd love to hear preferred days/times, what you'd like to see >>> covered / format (IRC vs g+ vs ?), etc. I'd like to see manual and >>> automated tests being written and hacked on as part of the 'fest. >>> Now is the time to get your feedback in :-) > > IRC would be better (imho) but we can try G+ as well > > >>> >>> To give you something concrete to work against, here's my thoughts >>> on how I would run the fest. >>> >>> We'll pick a 2-4? hour window on IRC on freenode in #ubuntu-quality >>> We'll encourage pending open bugs, aka, needed cases, to be try and >>> closed as part of the fest >>> We'll commit and merge everything possible at the end of the fest >>> We'll celebrate with virtual party supplies once complete :-) >> >> Cool, I'd like to see it for 1 full day instead of some specific hours, it >> works >> better for me at weekends but I don't expect other persons to be as >> antisocial >> as me =) > +1 I think weekends is better for all us... > > >> In my opinion I think it could follow the same format as the Ubuntu Bug >> day[0], >> which means a list of todo items should be generated somewhere (probably >> the >> wiki) and everyone could be able work on the ones that they want. In such >> format >> I'd like to see extra help on #ubuntu-quality, I mean, I've always been >> able to >> find help in there when needed, however I think it'd great if quality >> members >> could commit to be in there at specific hours depending of their time >> zones so >> voluntaries can find specially welcoming quality members waiting for them. > > I had the chance to participate in the bug day and its format is very cool! > maybe we can add some ideas. > > >> >> Just my 2 cents, I'm looking forward for participating =) >> >> [0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay >>> -- >>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >>> Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com >>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality >> >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >> Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130314/b6e5fe66/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:17:09 -0500 > From: Sergio Meneses <sergioandresmene...@gmail.com> > To: Thomas Corwin <dog1...@hotmail.com> > Cc: "ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com" > <ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com> > Subject: Re: Quick Question... > Message-ID: > <cajdxczwyxhsedj-incxfkzrauqq4qz_abxc8i60mxe0b0cw...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I dont know if I get your point completely, but you're asking for a new > ubuntu-testcase about wine, right? > > Sergio Meneses > Linux User: #478743 > Ubuntu User: #24056 > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Thomas Corwin <dog1...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello everyone! Now, I don't like to ask bad questions, especially when I >> don't have a voice in the matter, but, has anyone ever thought of adding a >> Wine section to the manual? >> >> Now, I know what some of you are thinking, "Why would we need this? It's >> completely unrelated." I think it is relative, mainly because it is a very >> common application used in Linux. >> >> If somehow, this idea is approved, I will take this section, otherwise, I >> may not be able to help in anyway to the manual, due to the fact I know >> more about Wine, than any of the available sections for editing. >> >> Thought I'd ask! >> Thomas Corwin >> -- >> Ubuntu-quality mailing list >> Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130314/47b23838/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:18:39 -0400 > From: St?phane Graber <stgra...@ubuntu.com> > To: Nicholas Skaggs <nicholas.ska...@canonical.com> > Cc: "ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com" > <ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com>, ubuntu-rele...@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Re: Upgrade tests are there own product > Message-ID: <5141f85f.3040...@ubuntu.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On 03/14/2013 12:12 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: >> Pas was asking about why upgrade tests are currently there own product >> (image) on the tracker, and as such are lumped away from the main >> product (image) tests. Is there a reason for this? Pasi was hoping more >> visibility would be had if those tests were pushed back into the main >> products themselves. So for example, the upgrade xubuntu tests would >> appear under xubuntu with the other installation tests. >> >> I know historically they've been seperated out, so I was hoping for some >> background information or feedback from someone who might have a reason >> to object to the change of moving these tests back into the main products. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Nicholas > > That'd be because a respin of an image shouldn't reset the upgrade > results. The upgrade products are typically reset all at the same time > whenever a massive change happens that affects upgrades. > > > -- > St?phane Graber > Ubuntu developer > http://www.ubuntu.com > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 901 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > URL: > <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130314/9934107a/attachment-0001.pgp> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:54:22 -0400 > From: HABS <h...@panix.com> > To: ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Introduction Harry Hawk > Message-ID: > <CAAHvF4V3d07jUuJRU78tgvj_hi3+=Ws=jwovl5id7qzq+lf...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I have purchased at Nexus 7 which I have dedicated to testing Ubuntu and > have the current install of 13.04 (March 9th) via the Nexus Core Installer > and updated via the Software Update. More often than note the update > process fails. I have yet to install the touch apps, which I plan on doing > shortly. > > My name is Harry S. Hawk. I'm moderately technical end use who has been > using *Nix since the mid 1980's. I have the most experience with NetBSD and > Ubuntu. I have a background in technology integration, marketing > communications and cooking. I am an expert at cooking regional hamburgers. > I hold degrees from NYU's ITP program and masters from SNHU's marketing > program. I have worked at AT&T Bell Labs, EF Hutton, and a variety of > advertising agencies. > > My most recent technical employment was at the newly relaunched Commodore > USA. I am currently managing retail operations and marketing at the Leske's > Bakery division of The Bread Depo, Inc. If you are in Brooklyn or visiting > Brooklyn please say hello.. The first DOUGHNUT is always FREE > www.LeskesBakery.com > > /hawk > h...@panix.com > **hawk > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130314/92978b93/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:22:16 +0100 > From: Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com> > To: Alex Janko <ajbi...@gmail.com> > Cc: "ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com" > <ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com> > Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-qa] 13.04 Beta 1 > Message-ID: <51420748.7050...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Is there a way to send this task to a developer, who would know > > 1. where that test is done (the source code) > > 2. how to do it (or pass the code to someone less skilled, but enough > skilled to compile and try out a snippet with that particular test on > various computers). > > If it is plain C or a bash or sh shellscript, I might dare an attempt at > it, but I definitely need some handholding, above all, I have no idea > where to find where the test is done. > > On 2013-03-14 12:42, Alex Janko wrote: >> Well...I assume its in assembly or CSomething and I know neither of >> those languages >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Mar 14, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I was thinking about how to report a bug: what details to check out and >>> explain. >>> >>> I think I understand what you want to do, and I think it will be >>> possible, but, well, I've retired from programming. Nowadays I'm helping >>> and testing. So I don't know where and how that check should be changed. >>> >>> But when you have something to test, I'm willing to check that it works >>> in my Pentium M computer. >>> >>> On 2013-03-14 11:53, Alex Janko wrote: >>>> We were just looking at how to possibly fix the CD loader to not require >>>> 7bit >>>> >>>> Like: >>>> >>>> If Pentium M { >>>> Skip PAE Check >>>> } Else If (PAE=1) { >>>> boot(); >>>> } Else { >>>> paeErrorBoot(); >>>> } >>>> >>>> Sorry O only knew how to write that out in java :) >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>> >>>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Phill, >>>>> >>>>> I have an IBM Thinkpad T42 with a non-pae Pentium M, that accepts 7bit's >>>>> fake-pae. What do you need? Please specify in detail, and I'll try to do >>>>> it :-) >>>>> >>>>> Nio alias sudodus >>>>> >>>>> On 2013-03-13 02:45, Phill Whiteside wrote: >>>>>> Hi alex, >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not have enough information to ask the developers about your >>>>>> problem. >>>>>> We really do need a bug filing as per my earlier email to you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Phill. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12 March 2013 14:15, Phill Whiteside <phi...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Oooch! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can always grab a non-pae version and install that so that the >>>>>>> machine >>>>>>> has a (u)buntu running. Lubuntu were still certainly releasing non-pae >>>>>>> versions up to 12.04 *i386 *[1] which should install on that machine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Phill. >>>>>>> 1. http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/precise/release/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12 March 2013 14:02, Alex Janko <ajbi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not anymore, no >>>>>>>> And my sash box just went down...for some reason when running a "chmod >>>>>>>> -R >>>>>>>> 444 /var/www/dir/dir/" it decided to ignore all of that and start at / >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2013, at 10:00 AM, Phill Whiteside <phi...@ubuntu.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have you got a version of ubuntu installed onto that computer? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Phill. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 12 March 2013 13:38, Alex Janko <ajbi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Being a noob...how do I do that exactly...link? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Phill Whiteside <phi...@ubuntu.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> would you please raise a bug against ubiquity, open a terminal session >>>>>>>>> and issue: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ubuntu-bug ubiquity >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> from the pentium M machine, I'm not too sure what the team can do >>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>> it if the machine does not advertise it, but it will allow them to >>>>>>>>> have a >>>>>>>>> think. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Phill. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 12 March 2013 12:34, Alex Janko <ajbi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hmm...I also notice that there is an issue with Pentium M >>>>>>>>>> models...they >>>>>>>>>> have PAE but yet don't advertise it...is there any way to allow the >>>>>>>>>> PAE >>>>>>>>>> ISOs to boot on Pentium M computers? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've been told it had to do with the boot check, not an actual failed >>>>>>>>>> boot >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Phill Whiteside <phi...@ubuntu.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Lars, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> well spotted.... I thought the list of testing was a bit shorter, but >>>>>>>>>> didn't spot why.... Any ways, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the >>>>>>>>>> ISO's? >>>>>>>>>>> (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there >>>>>>>>>>> (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out what >>>>>>>>>>> to respin >>>>>>>>>>> (12:07:06) ubot2: Launchpad bug 1153992 in Ubuntu CD Images "Raring >>>>>>>>>>> server and precise d-i installations fail at the clock configuring >>>>>>>>>>> step" >>>>>>>>>>> [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1153992 >>>>>>>>>>> (12:08:31) ***cjwatson sticks a notice on the iso.qa board >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, they're onto it :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Phill. >>>>>>>>>> P.S. you are allowed to ask directly on #ubuntu-release, the good >>>>>>>>>> people on there do not bite :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 12 March 2013 11:40, Lars Nood?n <lars.noo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 12.03.2013 04:53, Phill Whiteside wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> 1. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/261/builds >>>>>>>>>>>> 2. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/Testing >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I notice that there are no AMD64+Mac images. Are we skipping those >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> time? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> /Lars > > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > Ubuntu-quality mailing list > Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality > > > End of Ubuntu-quality Digest, Vol 65, Issue 20 > ********************************************** -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
