On 07/02/2013 11:55 AM, Brian Murray wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:28:39AM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> Can someone further analyze this paragraph. >> >> "For bugs in the Linux (Ubuntu) >> <https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux> package, >> unless the upstream maintainer or kernel developer notes otherwise, if a >> new mainline kernel comes out, and you haven't tested with it, your report >> is considered Status Incomplete <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status> >> whether >> or not someone toggled the Status of your report. " >> >> Source: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs >> >> >> Hi Istimsak, >> >> When a new mainline kernel comes out, we usually ask to have it tested. >> The primary purpose of this is to see if the bug has already been fixed >> upstream. If it has been fixed upstream, we check to see if it was also >> sent for inclusion in the upstream stable trees. If it wasn't sent to >> upstream stable, we then figure what exact commit fixed the bug, then >> cherry pick it into the Ubuntu stable kernels. >> >> A bug is also set to Incomplete when the apport logs are not included in >> the report. >> >> I'm not sure if this is the information you were looking for. If not, >> just let me know and I can provide some additional details. > I also think part of the original statement "your report is considered > Status Incomplete ... whether or not someone toggled the status of your > report", is trying to address the fact that Launchpad automatically > confirms bugs if a bug is made a duplicate of another or if someone > clicks "affects me too". Is that right Joe? > > -- > Brian Murray Yes that is correct.
-- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
