On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:27:43PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > To <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20importances>, I would suggest > adding a new criteria under the critical importance (or something > like this): > > "It simplifies software contents, bug fixing or development" > > So, although not doing this apparently hasn't got any critical > consequences, it already eliminates the main sources of waste. > > That is excess of inventories: dozens of bugs already fixed in > upgrades that are asked to be performed, generally in special types > of bugs > (<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20triage#Special_types_of_bugs>) > > In fact, eliminating excess of inventory first is a general accepted > recommendation in many productivity philosophies: > > - Just in Time > (<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_in_time_%28business%29>) > - 5S (<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5S_%28methodology%29#1._Seiri>) > - Lean Six Sigma (<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_six_sigma>) > - The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People > (<http://hdbizblog.com/blog/2008/04/28/sharpen-the-saw-the-7th-habit-of-highly-effective-people/>) > > The amount of bugs of this kind are a few and working on them first > can save lot of time in the medium term, while also making the > fixing of critical bugs more speedy. > > So, what do you think?
I think that actions should not be justified[1] with a reason of "It simplifies software contents, bug fixing or development" when that reasoning is still under active discussion. [1] I've seen this used in one bug report already. -- Brian Murray Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
