On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:49:17 Steve Langasek wrote: > ... >> Because you're building it from a ppa, so it's not a remix. > ... > > Canonical has published "remixes" that included PPA packages, so there's > nothing novel about this. I can't seem to find the official definition of a > Remix > on Ubuntu.com anymore, but IIRC UNR [1] was not fully in the archive when > initially released. I don't think the Moblin Remix [2] was either, but my > memory about that one is less clear. > > I actually agree that is should not be a remix, but that's not the way the > term has been used so far. >
I believe this was tightened [1] up by the tech board after conversations [2] back in 2012 about Ubuntu Business Remix and the policy surrounding the extension repos. [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2012-February/001215.html [2] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2012-January/001177.html Cheers, -- Alan Pope Technical Project Manager Canonical - Product Strategy +44 (0) 7973 620 164 alan.p...@canonical.com http://ubuntu.com/ -- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
