Maybe this should be a package we can propose to the Medibuntu project. Thay already have a metapackage for the w32/w64/ppc codecs packages, wich choose the good codec package depending on your cpu kind. It should be possible to add a bigger list of package in this metapackage, I guess.
Toine Cory K. a écrit : > Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> I'm wondering if we should go through the trouble of creating to >>> metapackages for A/V codecs? The obvious free and nonfree. >>> >>> They would include any audio *and* video codec that fits into either >>> category. "Free" could ship on the disks. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -Cory \m/ >>> >>> >> Codecs are in a legal void I am not very clear about. I would need >> somebody to clarify me how does Ubuntu and Canonical deal with sharing >> codecs that don't explicitely permit this in their license uses. Maybe >> having a metapackage of so in an official project as Ubuntu Studio is >> a lawyer no no. >> >> Luis >> > > I shoulda mentioned this. Maybe just split the 2 based on archive. > free=Universe, nonfree=Multiverse. That way, we should be clear. And the > lists that actually make up the metas is up for debate. I'm more just > wondering about the validity of the idea. > > -Cory \m/ > > -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
