[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Cory K. a écrit : > >> Luis de Bethencourt wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm wondering if we should go through the trouble of creating to >>>> metapackages for A/V codecs? The obvious free and nonfree. >>>> >>>> They would include any audio *and* video codec that fits into either >>>> category. "Free" could ship on the disks. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> -Cory \m/ >>>> >>> Codecs are in a legal void I am not very clear about. I would need >>> somebody to clarify me how does Ubuntu and Canonical deal with sharing >>> codecs that don't explicitely permit this in their license uses. Maybe >>> having a metapackage of so in an official project as Ubuntu Studio is >>> a lawyer no no. >>> >>> Luis >>> >> I shoulda mentioned this. Maybe just split the 2 based on archive. >> free=Universe, nonfree=Multiverse. That way, we should be clear. And the >> lists that actually make up the metas is up for debate. I'm more just >> wondering about the validity of the idea. >> >> -Cory \m/ >> > > Maybe this should be a package we can propose to the Medibuntu project. > > Thay already have a metapackage for the w32/w64/ppc codecs packages, > wich choose the good codec package depending on your cpu kind. It should > be possible to add a bigger list of package in this metapackage, I guess. > > Toine >
Please don't top-post. :) I wanna keep as many things in the repo as we can. So we'll look to the official repos 1st. -Cory \m/ -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel