On 10/18/2009 06:00 PM, Scott Lavender wrote: > I started making progress on the wiki documentation. I first looked at > the three pages Eric mentioned on the Oct 12 meeting agenda > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2009Oct12 . > > On Friday I updated the applications page on the wiki, there are still a > few little things to complete. > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Applications > > To also complete the update of the application lists on the wiki I will > also be addressing these pages in the near future: > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Audio > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Audio > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Video > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/Notation > > I'm not fluent in all these apps but I can get update the applications > listed and in some cases give the page _some_ text. Others will need to > update them also. > > During the weekend I also looked at the Installation and GettingStarted > pages that Eric mentioned. > > Obviously, the installation page need some work but I felt that we > should probably address installing the current and LTS versions of > Ubuntu Studio and also upgrading from the current and the LTS version of > Ubuntu only. No point in telling people how to install/upgrade Feisty. > Just my two cents. > > As I read the GettingStarted page I felt like this was a microcosm for > the entire wiki. By this I mean it's focus is diffused and lacked > overall structure. Yes, the page in a logical order, but the > information about adding the -rt kernel should probably be on a upgrade > from Ubuntu page. Defining JACK and how to set it up should like wise > be addressed on it's own pertinent and dedicated page. > > What this probably means is that the wiki pages would benefit from some > restructuring. Over this weekend I spent time mind mapping the wiki and > hopefully by next weekend I will have mockups available on the wiki. > Which leads me to my next question: > > Does anyone object to me making temporary new pages? > > For the time being it would be duplicate information (parsed out from > existing pages and condensed) with some additional text/structure. We > would need to be able to delete some of those pages at a later date and > I don't know who has rights. > > If I don't get any responses to the a new wiki structure and temporary > duplicate pages I will take silence as acceptance. >
This has been needed for some time and I welcome your effort. Non-silent +1 from me. ;) -Cory K. -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
