Don't know how much more RAM different destops would add. How much is Xubuntu compared with Ubuntu Studio? And how much would Ubuntu Studio be if we only changed the WM, nothing else?
I for one, don't expect that any WM will be that resource intensive by itself, that it would make a really big difference in RAM usage. Just compare Ubuntu and Ubuntu Studio. Regular Ubuntu Natty uses quickly up to 2GB of RAM, while UBuntu Studio Natty uses about 1GB, both using the classic Gnome Desktop. Using Unity instead of Gnome does not impact on that from what I can see, so how much is the WM actually doing? On 04/12/2011 12:36 PM, C K wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Eric Hedekar <aftertheb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> XFCE does not seem like it has anything to offer other than old/reliable >> code. > > That's a pretty strong reason for choosing it actually. That, and the > fact that it uses GTK will make it a less jarring switch than GNOME > shell or Canonical's Unity. > > It's resource intensiveness is not a factor as it's equal to or less > than current GNOME2. > -- ailo -- Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
