On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:24:54 +0100, set wrote: >On 2015-10-29 11:09, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >>I tested Krita as a replacement for GIMP. Krita is completely >>unusable. It's missing features and the performance is much to >>slow. >Strange, i use it very much and never had to complain about anything. I >actually have got a design studio in barcelona to migrate to it from >adobe tools. But it is important to know krita is not a substitute to >gimp. It's really made for digital painting/drawing.
Gimp (and PhotoShop) are for painting/drawing too. Krita performs on other machines as other apps do? On my machine it performs very bad. It's very, very slow. Does it require special graphics settings, CPU and or RAM resources that aren't needed for GIMP? -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
