After spinning this in my head a few times: On 2018-04-02 13:27, Set Hallstrom wrote: > I'm not saying it's a prefect process, and i agree that beggars can't be > choosers. But it is my opinion that we need some kind of sign of moral > commitment to the project, or we could as well just make everything public.
I'd like to add that there are many good reasons, as you mention, to want to allow users to sign the CoC directly from launchpad, but removing the manual steps would also potentially open for easier automation of that process to spam-bots. I have had a long and unresolved internal struggle about the dilemma of making things easier at the cost of leveling things to lowest denominator. On one hand, i understand that most users don't want to struggle with computing per-se and rather get on with using the computer for their production purpose without having to know how the tools work behind the scene. On the other hand in an ever more digitalized society, this makes me sad: I'd wish more users would be inclined to take control over their tools. I don't know what kind of process is best. But it's a question that should be asked to ubuntu at large; ubuntustudio alone doesn't have much say in it. -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
