Hi Alex,

Thanks for your enthusiasm & sharing your experience/s with Ubuntu Studio, I think it really may be helpful, not only for me... but toward the continued development of a successfully functioning, truly useful multi-media on the Linux OS!

I was going to suggest, as another part of this outlook you portray, that since one has already (i.e., as I have) installed a version that is not fully functioning properly, that experimental surgery might be done, as a part of the learning process... That is, until I went into the Synaptic Package Manager & tried to (started to) remove the Pulse Audio portion... & the manager informed me that it would need to remove the Ubuntu Studio Desktop also... This is a similar circumstance I found myself in Ubuntu (regular) 8.10, where I did this to a feature, the manager informed me, as stated above, I went ahead, & then developed insoluble problems from which I was unable to get help... & they involved  making my external partitions (I do dual boot w/ Windows XP) unavailable; in general, cd/dvd devices, trash; GNOME & Nautilus were largely disfunctional... & I had to do a number of sideways dances to get the files I needed saved... so that I could do a clean install... (I used my Windows formatted disk space for temporary back up, not so great, but it works for me).

So, I downloaded the Ubuntu Studio 8.04.1 & made a dvd for installation, & I will try to do a migration backward... to try your advice... on building a useful install... (hopefully, I can get to see what the -rt kernel is about) but what I am now wondering, for one, if, say, I have a pre-install choice to install Pulse, OSS, etc... if not, removing will most likely be a possible problem; & for two, a question I have had since "upgrading" to 8.10 is regarding the choices for mount point. I have found no documentation... & I do not really understand the implications for each of the options (at install time)? I have been selecting "/" as my mount point... & can one change this after the install (with, say, GRUB)/

Thanks again for you very thoughtful expressions regarding Ubuntu Studio...

Henry


alex stone wrote:
And i'll leave the flame suit in the locker as well, but i will say i don't think Pulse, which is a...domestic sound server, should be auto installed in what i consider a 'craftsman's' OS like Ubuntustudio. 
However some apps we use aren't built with Jack, and i can see why, given the continuity that Ubuntu seeks to maintain, pulse gets a viewing. But i maintain my view that Jack is a much better end result for a recording/graphic/mixing environment.
 
That said, i faced the same situation as you when i graduated from Gutsy to Hardy, and i decided at the time to install a barebones setup with Hardy, and install as much as i could from up to date source, for precisely the reason you gave, of the multiple app dependencies that, when 1 app was removed, seemed to take a shedload of others with it.
So i share the following based on my own modest experience:
 
UbuntuStudio, like it's counterparts in the Ubuntu family, is based on stability, hence the lag in updates. Ubuntu isn't on its own with this, and it's worth remembering here that the UB team is a small one, and they cover a lot of ground maintaining the Ubuntu standard, for our benefit. We get good value as users, and we have the choice as to installation direction, either in Deb packages, or removing a handful of apps, and patiently reinstalling them from source, taking the chance that we'll be able to without too much angst. There are exceptions, Musescore being an obvious example, where user enthusiasm drove a fairly significant update, quickly. (Thanks Toby for doing this.)
 
So I respectfully suggest here that you take a step back, grab a decent nip of cognac, and plan ahead.
 
I wrote a list of apps that i use regularly based on experiments in workflow that i conducted over some period of time.
After the list was done, and i'd collected all the source, SVN, CVS, Waf, and Git addresses, i then installed Hardy UbStudio, selecting NONE of the software install options for sound or graphic during the install process.
The first thing i did when the install was finished, was remove pulse, through Synaptic.
 
As i hadn't installed a shedload of apps, the 'damage' was minimal, and didn't pull much back out at all. I then scoured the bin, lib, share, and include directories for any vestiges of pulse, that may have got left behind in some obscure dependency requirement.
 
I then updated Alsa, to a later build, installing only those modules i wanted.
 
Then Jack.
 
Then LAD/Ingen/Patchage, and LASH, including all the up to date libs and lib dev files from both ubstudio repos, and online. (libsoundfile being a good example here.)
 
That's the sound server, and it's environment done, including any GUI's required.
This a good place to check progress, and make sure the framework is sound, and reliable. (Good foundations, right?)
 
After that it was LV2 and ladspa plugs.
 
Then the main apps like Linuxsampler, Rosegarden, Ardour, Jconv, Aeolus, and so on, carefully reading install instructions, and taking note of any dependencies required, and importantly, their version numbers.
 
I guess you could say this is a fairly methodical approach, but it's born out of clumsy user experience on my part, as i learnt to plan ahead, and not go through 1 step forward, and 2 sideways, trying to match dependencies, and not lose a handful of apps in the process. I got the message eventually.
 
It's obvious to say this isn't windows, or simple out of the box stuff, but the reward for me was a lean, fast, powerful system, with ONLY the apps i wanted, and no bloat. (Within my very limited linux perception of what constitutes bloat.)
 
You might well be happy with installing everything, and shuffling back and forth, and that's certainly more than suitable for those who like this approach. But after a lot of experiments, and associated mistakes, i finally get the wisdom of the modular mindset of linux, and the high percentage of satisfaction that comes with that.
 
Henry, i have no idea of your linux skill level, or what you want out of your setup, so i only offer a personal experience of what works for me. I wouldn't go back to a 'install the lot then up date' approach, as the plan ahead and patiently install method, gives me a better result, with good stability, and the advantage of all those extra tools clever devs are building, and have done so in the last 6 months or so.
 
I can't offer anything for your soundcard, as i'm using something else, but a trip to the ALSA site, and a browse in their soundcard matrix, may turn up something in changelogs that may give a clue to the current state of your particular module.
 
So as far as Pulse goes, and only as my experience, i pulled it all out, and then followed Alsa and Jack instructions to setup a dedicated, or 'craftsman's' sound server.
I find it easy now i know a little bit, and Jack's no bother at all. In my humble opinion, it smacks anything else i've ever used for ease of use, and i used to run 5 boxes, running the nightmare that was multiple Gigastudio instances, just to achieve the same result for 1 linux box, and the mighty Linuxsampler.
Match that with Rosegarden, Ardour, Ingen, Aeolus and Jconv, and the extra effort to install up to date packages from source, in a 'craftsman's' build, is more than worth it.
 
I've certainly rambled on here, but i'm enthusiastic about this stuff, because, with a plan, and a source based install and maintenance approach, it gives much greater end results, imho.
 
I wish you luck and success, whichever path you take.
 
Alex.
 
 
 
 
 
 

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Henry W. Peters <hwpet...@jamadots.com> wrote:
I am having troubles with my Ubuntu Studio 8.10:

  • It came with Ardour ver. 2.5, aside from sound input problems (which I shall try to briefly address below), that version gave (& now again, gives) me problems. I believe I need to uninstall the earlier version to reinstall 2.7.1, is this correct... & if so, I do not have the source folder to do a 'make uninstall' command, & the synaptic package manager wants to take out 'ubuntustudio sound' if I go this route. Is Ardour 2.7.1 even compatible with Studio 8.10, & if it is, I am wondering why was it not included in this system upgrade, including the latest version of jack & qjackctl?   What to do?
  • There was, a while back, some discussion regarding Pulse audio (& possibly OSS), I do not wish to reignite that discussion (I think I do not wish to use them), but I do think some one mentioned taking Pulse Audio out (possible conflict w/ Alsa???). Is there some way to do this (or even determine if this might have some conflict with my sound card/alsa setup (including OSS?)? My sound card is MiaMidi (Echo Corp., manufactured).
  • The sound preferences control panel also has a very confusing array of options...  which I may need to get back on, that is if the possible solutions mentioned to the above are not resolving my no sound input problem... (by the way, the sound input I am trying to connect  from (I say from, because I get sound out, just fine) is a s/pdif from my Yamaha 01v digital mixer. & I do get internal sound to run some radio/sound players, the echomixer does seem to control the digital output of the Yamaha 01v, but no sound to the above mentioned programs (& also, not exclusive to Ardour) etc., but cd players are another matter, or should I say, puzzle for me at the moment; first things first).
Please feel free to ask for any clarifications (I have been trying my best since my foray to Ubuntu, going on a year now to resolve with out adding to the oft heard battle cry: "I can't get no sound), etc. Any help would be, as usual, most appreciated.

Henry

-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users

Reply via email to