David, 2010/10/5 David Henningsson <david.hennings...@canonical.com>: [...] > great that you want to manage these kernels!
I have always managed -rt kernels in Ubuntu since Feisty Until Maverick where I have gave up for personal reasons. > I'm mostly curious about -lowlatency, but unfortunately I haven't got around > to test it. I think -preempt is a server kernel? Could you also say that > -lowlatency is the desktop version of -preempt? I don't know much about -preempt. A low latency kernel in server context make little sense to me at least. > Is there a difference between -rt and -realtime, except that your -realtime > seems more updated than -rt? Do you think we should replace the official > linux-rt, with your linux-realtime? Few minutes ago I replied to Laurent about that. > closely until now, so I'd also like to ask you - do you feel you have the > support you need from the kernel-team's side for maintaining these kernels? Really I don't understand what you mean with "feel". In any case I avoid to reply on this answer because I don't want start a flame. [...] > I think we need to have it for every release, to get the best possible > testing and quality of these kernels. If that's possible? The time of one-man-kernel-made is finished. So if people want the real time kernel they should help. >> Please reply only if you want help. > > Just to clarify, did you mean "if you need help" (you help me) or "if you > want to help" (I help you) ? I don't need help unless you want offer me a serious job. Real time kernel need help. All -rt kernels have always worked well on my old laptop also the infamous Intrepid and Jaunty releases. Ciao, Alessio -- Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
