On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Christopher M. Penalver < christopher.m.penal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fritz Hudnut, my eyes must not be refined enough to see the problem. It is very clear in the last photos, if you know what a topographic map looks like? Do you know what I'm referring to when I say "topographic"?? If you look into the desktop image(s), rather than a blending transition, as is the probable intention--the transitions are "stacked" like a topographic map image of a mountain. And along with that the edges of the different "elevations" are jaggedy lines . . . . On the screen it is very blatant . . . the desktop images look like they are formed by a low resolution graphics driver . . . whereas the icons and text are rendered very well. I think that is also clear in the #135 image. Look carefully and you can see what I'm talking about in the photos. Up to you, just so you know that it is still a problem, and it is not "subtle" or anything that could be missed . . . . F -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1541082 Title: [PowerMac3,1] Blotchy GUI graphics for images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1541082/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat Post to : ubuntu-x-swat@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
