Corinna Schultz wrote: > Quoting Carmelo AMOROSO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> a colleague of mine is right now working to produce a patch for >> posix_fadvise to fix all LTP tests using posix_fadvise[64]. >> >> Indeed LTP tests expect that, when posix_fadvise[64] fails, >> it should return as return value an error code (-errno) instead >> of simply setting properly errno and returning -1. > > Did you see my earlier message, detailing the errors I'm seeing? I have > very little experience with this low-level programming, and don't really > know how to begin fixing it, so if you have people already working on > it, I'll happily wait for your patch. :) Do you have an estimate of when > your patch will be available? > > -Corinna > > > hopefully today :-)
Cheers, Carmelo _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
