Corinna Schultz wrote: > Quoting Carmelo AMOROSO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Does anybody (other than sh4) tried posix_fadvise tests? > > Carmelo, I was finally able to test this today. The tests are still > failing for me (I'm on ppc32), though for different reasons than before > :-) . I have not tried the ppc workaround patch yet, though. I'll let > you know. > The work-around is just for fixing build problem on powerpc. I suppose that powerpc might need an ad hoc implementation. Indeed glibc has these two files sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/posix_fadvise.c sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/posix_fadvise64.c
So, you may be able to port glibc implementation and adapt to uclibc and post a patch for inclusion. Sorry, but I cannot do more on powerpc. Cheersm Carmelo > > > > > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
