On Sunday 16 November 2008 21:57:41 Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Sometime ago I removed string.h related libc_hidden_proto's. > There were a few bumps, but nothing tragic. > > So now it sits half-done, something like: > > ... > /* Experimentally off - libc_hidden_proto(strlen) */ > /* Experimentally off - libc_hidden_proto(strncat) */ > /* Experimentally off - libc_hidden_proto(strncpy) */ > /* libc_hidden_proto(strnlen) */ > /* Experimentally off - libc_hidden_proto(strstr) */ > /* Experimentally off - libc_hidden_proto(strcasecmp) */ > libc_hidden_proto(socket) > libc_hidden_proto(close) > libc_hidden_proto(fopen) > libc_hidden_proto(fclose) > libc_hidden_proto(random) > ... > > Unless there are some big pending merges which would > rather see it postponed, I will start removing the rest of them.
I've forgotten what libc_hidden_proto() does, but this raises a bigger question: Bernhard, do you have a roadmap for 0.9.31? When's the next release targeted for? I know you told Carmelo to merge the nptl stuff, but is there anything else in the offing? (Trying to remove some of the 8 gazillion warnings, perhaps?) Any opinion on whether it's worth bothering the google people to try to get explicit permission to use the android threading stuff under LGPL? Rob _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
