Khem Raj wrote: > On (08/12/08 10:35), Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >> On 07/12/2008, Ricard Wanderlof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Hiroshi Shinji wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Khem, >>>> Thanks for your comment. >>>> >>>> 2008/12/6 Khem Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>> Getting NULL for ifa_addr means that the interface has no address. Do >>>>> you know in what cases does this happen. Patch looks ok though. >>>> True. My environment has a interface that has no address. >>>> >>>> And, previous source code had another problem. 'for' statement had no >>>> '{' and '}'. Therefore, If you defined both __UCLIBC_HAS_IPV4__ and >>>> __UCLIBC_HAS_IPV6__, the second 'if' statement would be outside of the >>>> for-loop and occure segfault. >>> This stuff seems to continuously come back and haunt me ... :-( (I was the >>> original poster of check_pf-stuff, although it has been modified since >>> then so can't take credit for all the problems. :-) Patch looks good to me >>> anyway. >>> >>> /Ricard >>> -- >>> Ricard Wolf Wanderl�f ricardw(at)axis.com >>> Axis Communications AB, Lund, Sweden www.axis.com >>> Phone +46 46 272 2016 Fax +46 46 13 61 30 >>> >> Khem, >> may you give a try at this patch on nptl branch ? I'm wondering if >> this is the cause >> of the segfault we are seeing in sysv-init. I've merged getaddrinfo.c > > Carmelo > > I tried this patch on arm. Did not help :( > > Thx > > -Khem > ok. thanks. I'll keep to debug it. carmelo
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc