-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 18 March 2009 02:15:09 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> Austin Foxley wrote: >>> Out of necessity, I've got the nptl branch working with sparc32. >>> Linuxthreads was giving our heavy thread using application trouble. >>> >>> Attached is the (sort of large) patch. >>> Basically it's just an update from glibc/sparc32 nptl, plus some renames >>> to make it match up with what uClibc expects. >>> What doesn't work yet is cancellation, as well as the cancellation >>> version of libc/stdlib/system.c. >>> >>> Also, it looks like the two patches I sent for sparc earlier didn't get >>> applied to trunk. Since I'm a pretty active user of at least 32-bit >>> sparc, I wouldn't mind helping maintain that side of things. >> I've not seen any support for TLS ? do you intend to add is separately >> later? > > are you speaking in general or just this patch ? sparc has TLS support ... > -mike just this patch. I would expect some changes into ldso/ldso/sparc/elfinterp.c for handling XXX_TLS_XXX relocations, would not I ?
Ciao -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknAlzgACgkQoRq/3BrK1s8NkACdEa7NJfnkdyU5j7u0YRMcy1Zu ovcAoIgNRmqeB0DNzSZLS6IzJk9D7tqF =z5cR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
