On Wednesday 18 March 2009 02:39:52 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 March 2009 02:15:09 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > >> Austin Foxley wrote: > >>> Out of necessity, I've got the nptl branch working with sparc32. > >>> Linuxthreads was giving our heavy thread using application trouble. > >>> > >>> Attached is the (sort of large) patch. > >>> Basically it's just an update from glibc/sparc32 nptl, plus some > >>> renames to make it match up with what uClibc expects. > >>> What doesn't work yet is cancellation, as well as the cancellation > >>> version of libc/stdlib/system.c. > >>> > >>> Also, it looks like the two patches I sent for sparc earlier didn't get > >>> applied to trunk. Since I'm a pretty active user of at least 32-bit > >>> sparc, I wouldn't mind helping maintain that side of things. > >> > >> I've not seen any support for TLS ? do you intend to add is separately > >> later? > > > > are you speaking in general or just this patch ? sparc has TLS support > > just this patch. I would expect some changes into > ldso/ldso/sparc/elfinterp.c for handling XXX_TLS_XXX relocations, would > not I ?
i would guess as much, but i'm not familiar with sparc relocs. i do know that last i looked the sparc ldso would s**t itself even in normal mode ;). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
