On Thursday 19 November 2009 02:46:38 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:31:40PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > >Why is the __nonnull(2) still there? Isn't the point of this to ensure > > that the second argument _can_ be null? > > Please read the whole thread,
Um, I thought I did read the whole thread. Did I miss messages? (You posted on November 12th, Peter Kjellerstedt responded with two comments (multiple variables on one line, allocated path never used), you went "right that should have read" and a one line changing the assignment of allocated_path, and then you posted a new patch in reply to that message.) Ah, I see, the second patch you posted in reply to Peter's comments had unrelated changes made silently, and this was one. My bad, sorry I missed that. Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc