On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Rob Landley wrote: > worked, and is not an option if _I_ don't want to have to switch to eglibc. > (Which is lgplv3. Ew.)
It appears you haven't actually looked at the EGLIBC sources. It's LGPLv2.1 (or greater, so if you want to distribute pieces under LGPLv3 you can), like FSF GLIBC. What happens if FSF GLIBC changes license is up to the EGLIBC Consortium. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
