Commit 4916fd88 (present in v0.9.32, but not in v0.9.32-rc3) created a new dependency on libgcc_eh.a for the final link stage:
uClibc-0.9.32/libubacktrace/Makefile.in: ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM_EABI),y) LIBGCC += $(shell $(CC) -print-file-name=libgcc_eh.a) endif I build gcc stage 1 with --disable-shared, which causes libgcc_eh.a not to be built: gcc-4.5.2/libgcc/Makefile.in: ifeq ($(enable_shared),yes) all: libgcc_eh.a libgcc_s$(SHLIB_EXT) ... Therefore, I am not able to build uClibc 0.9.32 with my gcc stage 1 compiler. This worked fine on uClibc 0.9.32-rc3. I see that Rob Landley has patched his gcc source tree so that it always builds libgcc_eh.a. Is this the recommended procedure going forward? Rob: > I'm building stock gcc 4.2.1 with binutils 2.17 (last GPLv2 release of > each, I await either LLVM or PCC maturing to usability with bated > breath). I am applying a few patches but none of them are sparc > stuff. (Half of them fix various issues with arm, one makes > libgcc_eh.a build during the --disable- shared pass, and the rest fix > OBVIOUS breakage with sh4, alpha, and mips64 of the "how did they ever > use those targets" variety). _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
