Hi, On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 06:36:35PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 05:59:16PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > > On 16/12/11 15:57, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > > I was able to fix the issue like this: > > > > > > --- uClibc-0.9.33/libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/sigaction.c.orig > > > 2011-12-03 18:55:45.000000000 +0100 > > > +++ uClibc-0.9.33/libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/sigaction.c > > > 2011-12-14 11:48:52.000000000 +0100 > > > @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ > > > > > > return __libc_sigaction (sig, act, oact); > > > } > > > -libc_hidden_proto(sigaction) > > > +hidden_proto(sigaction) > > > weak_alias (__sigaction, sigaction) > > > -libc_hidden_weak(sigaction) > > > +hidden_weak(sigaction) > > > > > > #else > > > > ... > > I think that the proper fix is to remove sigaction from libpthread,a > > instead. > > But they are not identical, libpthread/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/sigaction.c > has this comment: > > /* We use the libc implementation but we tell it to not allow > SIGCANCEL or SIGTIMER to be handled. */
Could you please let me know if you agree with my proposed fix? Thanks Johannes _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc