On 6 February 2013 10:06, Will Newton <will.new...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Markos Chandras > <markos.chand...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5 February 2013 19:08, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >> <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 23 January 2013 12:41, Markos Chandras <markos.chand...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> From: Markos Chandras <markos.chand...@imgtec.com> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> This is the v3 of the patchset I sent on the 26th of November 2012[1]. >>>> >>>> Changes since v2: >>>> >>>> - Base patches on the uClibc master branch >>>> - Fix libc_hidden_def for faccessat when implementing the access syscall[2] >>>> - Make vfork act as fork using the clone syscall[3] >>>> - Fix #ifdef clause for the stat syscall[4] >>>> - c6x is a new arch, so it does not need ARCH_HAS_DEPRECATED_SYSCALLS[5] >>>> - Fix non-LFS compilation problems[6] >>>> - Add new struct stat and struct statfs for new architectures so we can >>>> pass them directly to syscalls and avoid conversion code[7] >>> >>> Looks pretty good, thanks. One thing though: >>> >>> I really don't like common-no-legacy. >>> Can you propose a different way instread? >> >> Hi Bernhard, >> >> Thanks for taking time reviewing this patchset. >> >> How about: >> >> - common-new >> - new-interfaces > > generic > generic-syscalls > > generic wouldn't be entirely self-explanatory but would be short. ;-)
I'd prefer generic-syscalls. 'generic' seems similar to 'common' so it might be a bit confusing. Bernhard, are you ok with "generic-syscalls"? -- Regards, Markos Chandras _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc