>>>>> "Khem" == Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> writes:
Hi, >>>> The code nicely checks for it, but then ends up hard coding the >>>> syscall to use __NR_pread64 afterwards, rendering the check >>>> useless. Fix it by using the result of the test instead. >> Mike> i think you should look at all the pread/pwrite changes in Mike> master. afaik, all issues are addressed there. >> >> Yes, possible. I'm trying to test the 0.9.33 branch to hopefully speed >> up the 0.9.33.3 release as there's quite some fixes pending, but it >> looks like some more stuff should get backported. >> >> Anybody else testing the branch? > I would be interested if you try out latest master. Sorry for the slow response - I only now found time to do so. I'm happy to say that the pread issue ISN'T present on todays snapshot of master. So these pread/pwrite changes imho should get backported to to the 0.9.33 branch if we ever plan on doing a bugfix release from it. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@uclibc.org http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc