- you forwarded my patches after you edit them. - I was not on CC - I sent [1] you did [2]. Did not check further because I went boooom - You did not take even one of my fec clean up patches but you merged the locking fix. Since this patch was after the cleanup one you had spent some time to make it applym didn't you. Now I have to spent some more time to rebase everything. _This_ is unnecessary work for both of us.
Now before I start rebasing my tree: Is there a reason why you avoided the fec clean up patch? There was _no_ functional change it just made the code easier to read. Now how do we proceed further on this? Do you take my remaing patches and rebase them yourself or do you want me to do it? Do you accept them? May we agree on a git tree? This would make things easier I guess. Even Russell has one these days :) This would atleast avoid [2]. And if you remove the stack address in my other patch please let me know or alteast leave a not in the patch description that you edit it. And if you want me to run a "new features" tree for you / your next merge window just let me know. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/uclinux-dev@uclinux.org/msg04424.html [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120960825016027&w=2 Sebastian _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
